School of Law
Our Recruiters
FAQS
Do you assist students in placements, summer internships, and industry tours?
School of Professional Attachment (SPA) in The NorthCap University works stalwartly with the industry and has good corporate liaison which help the students to develop themselves through various guest lectures, industrial partnerships, summer internships, placements and other industry connects.
How does NCU prepare students to be job-ready?
The NorthCap University firmly believes in providing not only a job but a good career to its students. In this context the university works for the holistic development of the student by focusing on the quality of learning and innovation in all programs with rigor and relevance. We continuously improve our academic excellence according to upcoming corporate environment. The students by virtue of industry projects, case studies, assignments, personality development skill trainings prepare themselves for future.
What is kind of industry exposure you plan to give to students?
To provide deeper and wider insight into the respective discipline industry exposure is an important part of students’ academic journey. NCU provides practical opportunities depending on course viability to all its students to participate in various corporate symposia, summer internships, guest lectures, industrial tours, workshops & conferences and other events related to field of study.
How many times will a student go for internships in every program?
To get the feel of a real-life working environment and to be up-to-date with the latest skill set & technologies, The NorthCap University has a mandatory credit based internship for its students. The university according to the academic requirement of the respective course encourages students to gain real life practical experience by working in corporate within the speculated period of time.
What are the initiatives taken to groom the students and make them industry ready?
With the motto of ‘Students First’ and driving force behind all activities at NCU, we empower our students to achieve professional and personal success, ready to change the landscape of the future. Our objective is to transform our students into not only competent professionals, but also good human beings. The students are closely supported and mentored by a strong and progressive team of teachers, peer tutors and members in various statutory and advisory boards.
Here are some of the key steps to make the students industry ready –
Filling knowledge and skill gap
Focus on knowledge development from the beginning
Tracking timely student growth
Helping in making them understand the industry
The grooming sessions include activities like:
Individual career 180 degree analysis
Pre-Placement Interviews
Career counseling
Third party employability assessment tests
Summer Internships
Sharing industry experiences (Guest Lectures, Conclaves & Industry Visits)
Personality development classes
What kind of training is provided to hone student’s soft skills?
In addition to the hard (technical) skills, soft skills are required to be developed by a student to enhance employability. The main objective of our university is to equip a student with the right kind of skills and attitude so that they can become more effective, efficient and productive in their employer organizations much sooner than otherwise. A variety of sessions on Group Discussions, Personal Interviews and Situation based problem solving and self & social awareness are organized in order to enhance soft skills in a student.
What is your placement record?
We lay strong emphasis on the placement of our students. We have an enviable placement record wherein almost every eligible student is placed. The minimum CTC in the university is Rs. 3.00 LPA; Please refer to the above list of “Marquee Recruiters” Our alumni are shining high in corporate world by achieving new heights in the industry. Kindly find the Alumni details placed overseas & in India on reputed positions.
Mr. Subhankar Mohanty, Civil Judge, Odisha Judicial Service (Batch 2018)
Mr. Anshuman Tiwari, Manager-Legal, Biological E.Limited, Hyderabad
Ms. Yogita Bangar, M.Phil Candidate, Cambridge University
Ms. Rupali Srivastava, Associate, Chadha & Co. New Delhi
Harshit Dusad, Senior Associate, J. Sagar Associates
Lakshay Mehta, Senior Associate, DSK Legal
Criterion II
Criterion II – Teaching-Learning and Evaluation (200)
|
Metric No. |
Description |
Weightages |
|
Key Indicator – 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (10) |
||
| 2.1.1
QnM |
Enrollment Percentage
(i) Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of public disclosure (ii) Document relating to sanction of intake as approved by competent authority (iii) Admission extract signed by the competent authority (only fresh admissions to be considered) (iv) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
5 |
| 2.1.2
QnM |
Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first-year admission year-wise during the last five years
(i) Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of public disclosure (ii) Final admission list indicating the category as published by the HEI and endorsed by the competent authority. (iii) Copy of the letter issued by the State govt. or Central Government Indicating the reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc.) to be considered as per the state rule (Translated copy in English to be provided as applicable) (iv) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the (iv) claim (if any) |
5 |
|
Key Indicator – 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity (20) |
||
| 2.2.1
QlM |
The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes to cater to differential learning needs of the student
(i) Upload any Additional information (ii) Provide Link for Additional information |
5 |
| 2.2.2
QnM |
Student – Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)
(i) List showing the number of students in each of the programs for the latest completed academic year across all semesters (ii) Certified list of full-time teachers along with the departmental affiliation in the latest completed academic year. (iii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the (iii) claim (if any) |
15 |
|
Key Indicator – 2.3 Teaching – Learning Process (20) |
||
| 2.3.1
QlM |
Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem-solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experience and teachers use ICT-enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching learning process
(i) Upload any Additional information (ii) Provide Link for Additional information |
10 |
| 2.3.2
QlM |
The institution adopts effective Mentor-Mentee Schemes to address academics and student-psychological issues
(i) Upload any Additional information (ii) List of Active mentors (iii) Provide Link for Additional information |
10 |
|
Key Indicator – 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (60) |
||
| 2.4.1
QnM |
Average percentage of full-time teachers appointed against the number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years
(i) Sanction letters indicating number of posts sanctioned by the competent authority (including Management sanctioned posts). (ii) Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of public disclosure (iii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
10 |
| 2.4.2
QnM |
Percentage of full-time teachers with Ph.D. / D.M / M.Ch. / D.N.B / Superspeciality / L.L.D / D.S.C / D.Litt. during the last five years
(i) Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of public disclosure (ii) List of faculty having Ph.D. / D.M / M.Ch. / D.N. Superspeciality / along with particulars of the degree awarding university, subject and the year of award per academic year. (iii) Copies of Ph.D. / D.M / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality awarded by UGC recognized universities (iv) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
40 |
| 2.4.3
QnM |
Average teaching experience of full-time teachers (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year, in number of years)
(i) Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of public disclosure (ii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
10 |
|
Key Indicator – 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms (30) |
||
| 2.5.1
QnM |
Average number of days from the date of last semester-end / year-end examination till the last date of declaration of results year-wise during the last five years
(i) Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of public disclosure (ii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
10 |
| 2.5.2
QnM |
Percentage of student complaints / grievances about evaluation against total number of students appeared in the examinations during the last five years
(i) List the number of students who have applied for re-valuation / re-totalling program wise and the total certified by the Controller of Examinations year-wise for the assessment period. (ii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
10 |
| 2.5.3
QnM |
Status of automation of Examination division along with approved Examination Manual / ordinance: Opt anyone
A. 100% automation of entire division & implementation of Examination Management System (EMS) B. Only student registration, Hall ticket issue & Result Processing C. Only student registration and result processing D. Only result processing E. Only manual methodology (i) The screenshot should reflect the HEI name and the name of the module. (ii) The report on the present status of automation of examination division including screenshots of various modules of the software. (iii) If the EMS is outsourced, copy of the relevant contract and copies of bills of payment to be provided. (iv) Copies of the purchase order and bills / AMC of the software. (v) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
10 |
|
Key Indicator – 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes (30) |
||
| 2.6.1
QlM |
The institution has stated learning outcomes (Program and Course outcomes) / graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents and the attainment of the same are evaluated by the institution
(i) Upload COs for all courses (exemplars from Glossary) (ii) Upload any additional information (iii) Provide links as Additional Information |
15 |
| 2.6.2
QnM |
Pass percentage of students (excluding backlog students) (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year)
(i) Percentage of students of the final year (final semester) eligible for the degree program-wise / year-wise (ii) Certified report from the Controller of Examinations indicating the pass (iii) Annual report of COE highlighting the pass percentage of students (iv) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
15 |
|
Key Indicator – 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (30) |
||
| 2.7.1
QnM |
Online Student Satisfaction Survey regarding the teaching-learning process | 30 |
Criterion III – Research, Innovations and Extension (250)
|
Metric No. |
Description |
Weightages |
|
Key Indicator – 3.1 Promotion of Research and Facilities (20) |
||
| 3.1.1
QlM |
The institution’s Research facilities are frequently updated and there are well defined policy for promotion of research which is uploaded on the institutional website and implemented
(i) Upload COs for all courses (exemplars from Glossary) (ii) Upload any additional information (iii) Provide links as Additional Information |
2 |
| 3.1.2
QnM |
The institution provides seed money to its teachers for research (average per year)
(i) Sanction letters of seed money to the teachers is mandatory. (ii) List of faculty who have been provided with seed money for research along with the title of the project, duration and amount year-wise. (iii) Audited Income-Expenditure statement highlighting the expenditure towards seed money endorsed by the Finance Officer (iv) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
3 |
| 3.1.3
QnM |
Percentage of teachers receiving national / international fellowship / financial support by various agencies for advanced studies / research during the last five years
(i) List of teachers who have received the awards along with the nature of award, the awarding agency etc. (ii) E-copies of the award letters of the teachers. (iii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
5 |
| 3.1.4
QnM |
Percentage of JRFs, SRFs among the enrolled PhD scholars in the institution during the last five years
(i) List of JRFs, SRFs, Post Doctoral Fellows, Research Associates and other research fellows along with the details of the funding agency is to be provided. (ii) E copies of fellowship award letters (mandatory) (iii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
10 |
|
Key Indicator – 3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research (40) |
||
| 3.2.1
QnM |
Research funding received by the institution and its faculties through Government and non-government sources such as industry, corporate houses, international bodies for research project, Endowment Research Chairs during the last five years
(i) List of Extramural funding received for research, Endowment Research Chairs received during the last five years along with the nature of award, the awarding agency and the amount. (ii) E-copies of the letters of award for research, endowments, Chairs sponsored by non- government sources (iii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
25 |
| 3.2.2
QnM |
Number of research projects per teacher funded by government, non-government, industry, corporate houses, international bodies during the last five years
(i) List of project titles with details of Principal Investigator, amount sanctioned and sanctioning agency etc. (ii) E-copies of the grant award letters for research projects sponsored by government agencies. (iii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
15 |
|
Key Indicator – 3.3 Innovation Ecosystem (20) |
||
| 3.3.1
QlM |
Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS) including awareness about IPR, establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of technology / knowledge and the outcomes
of the same are evident (i) Upload any additional information (ii) Link for Additional information |
15 |
| 3.3.2
QnM |
Number of awards received for research / innovations by the institution / teachers / research scholars / students during the last five years
(i) e-Copies of award letters issued by the awarding agency (ii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
5 |
|
Key Indicators – 3.4 Research Publications and Awards (120) |
||
| 3.4.1
QnM |
The institution ensures implementation of its stated Code of Ethics for research
The institution has a stated Code of Ethics for research and the implementation of which is ensured through the following: 1. Inclusion of research ethics in the research methodology course work 2. Presence of institutional Ethics committees (Animal, chemical, bio-ethics etc.,) 3. Plagiarism check through software 4. Research Advisory Committee (i) Copy of the syllabus of the research methodology course work to indicate if research ethics is included. (ii) Constitution of the ethics committee and its proceedings as approved by the appropriate body. (iii) Constitution of research advisory committee and its proceedings as approved by the appropriate body. (iv) Bills of purchase of licensed plagiarism check software in the name of the HEI. (v) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
5 |
| 3.4.2
QnM |
Number of Patents awarded during the last five years
(i) Patents granted / published in the name of the faculty with the institutional affiliation to the university working during the assessment period only to be given. (ii) e-copies of letter of patent grant. (iii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
15 |
| 3.4.3
QnM |
Number of Ph.Ds awarded per recognized guide during the last five years
(i) PhD Award letters to PhD students. (ii) Letter from the university indicating name of the PhD student with title of the doctoral study and the name of the guide. (iii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
15 |
| 3.4.4
QnM |
Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC CARE list during the last five years
(i) List and links of the papers published in journals listed in UGC CARE list and (ii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) (iii) Link to the institutional website where the first page / full paper (with author and affiliation details) is published (iv) Link re-directing to journal source-cite website in case of digital journals |
20 |
| 3.4.5
QnM |
Number of books and chapters in edited volumes published per teacher during the last five years
(i) List of chapter/book with the links redirecting to the source website. (ii) E-copy of the Cover page, content page and first page of the publication indicating ISBN number and year of publication for books / chapters (iii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
10 |
| 3.4.6
QnM |
E-content is developed by teachers:
1. For e-PG-Pathshala 2. For CEC (Undergraduate) 3. For SWAYAM 4. For other MOOCs platforms 5. Any other Government Initiatives 6. For Institutional LMS (i) Supporting documents from the sponsoring agency for the e-content developed by the teachers need to be provided. (ii) Give links to upload document of e-content developed showing the authorship / contribution. (iii) For institution LMS a summary of the e-content developed and the links to the e-content should be provided (iv) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
15 |
| 3.4.7
QnM |
Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on average Citation Index in Scopus / Web of Science
(i) Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years (ii) Any additional information |
20 |
| 3.4.8
QnM |
Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on Scopus / Web of Science – h-Index of the University
(i) Bibliometrics of publications based on Scopus / Web of Science – h-index of the Institution (ii) Any additional information |
20 |
|
Key Indicator – 3.5 Consultancy (20) |
||
| 3.5.1
QnM |
Revenue generated from consultancy and corporate training during the last five years
(i) Letter from the corporate to whom training was imparted along with the fee paid. (ii) Letter from the beneficiary of the consultancy along with details of the consultancy fee. (iii) CA certified copy of statement of accounts as attested by head of the institution. (iv) Audited statements of accounts indicating the revenue generated through and corporate training / consultancy. (v) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
20 |
|
Key Indicator – 3.6 Extension Activities (20) |
||
| 3.6.1
QlM |
Outcomes of extension activities in the neighborhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues and holistic development, and awards received if any during the last five years (Showcase at least four case studies to the peer team)
(i) Upload any additional information (ii) Provide the link for additional information |
10 |
| 3.6.2
QnM |
Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums like NSS / NCC with involvement of community year wise during the last five years
(i) Geo-tagged Photographs and any other supporting document of relevance should have proper captions and dates. (ii) Detailed list and report for each extension and outreach program to be made available, with specific mention of number of students participated and the details of the collaborating agency (iii) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
10 |
|
Key Indicator – 3.7 Collaboration (10) |
||
| 3.7.1
QnM |
Number of functional MoUs / linkage with institutions / industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years
(i) Summary of the functional MoUs / linkage / collaboration indicating start date, end date, nature of collaboration etc. (ii) List of year wise activities and exchange should be provided (iii) List and Copies of documents indicating the functional MoUs / linkage / collaboration activity-wise and year-wise (iv) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) |
10 |